Meta’s expanding access to its updated Content Library and API tools, which is able to enable researchers to review Facebook and Instagram content, in an effort to uncover key usage trends and insights, and ideally help to raised inform social platform policy.
Meta has at all times provided a level of access to researchers, enabling them to review chosen usage data, though it did significantly limit its access parameters following the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018.
But now, Meta’s re-launching its data tools, which could open the door for all latest sorts of research projects.
As per Meta:
“Our Meta Content Library and API tools provide access to close real-time public content from Pages, Posts, Groups and Events on Facebook, in addition to from creator and business accounts on Instagram. Details in regards to the content, resembling the variety of reactions, shares, comments and, for the primary time, post view counts are also available. Researchers can search, explore and filter that content on each a graphical User Interface (UI) or through a programmatic API.”
That’ll facilitate expanded study options, and will, in some ways, act as a alternative for certain projects which recently found themselves cut off from Twitter access, on account of changes in how the corporate, now called ‘X’, is charging for its API tools.
Facilitating expanded Facebook and IG data might be a beneficial alternative, which can enable more social study projects to proceed.
Though Meta’s update isn’t all altruistic. Meta also notes that the brand new API will enable it to satisfy evolving regulatory requirements, data-sharing, and transparency compliance obligations. So, partially, Meta’s updated its access tools to satisfy these shifts. Besides, it’s a beneficial entry into Meta’s raft of user data, across two of essentially the most used social platforms in existence.
Meta has facilitated a variety of increasingly complex and beneficial data studies over time, including examinations of the links between social standing and economic opportunity, how careers run in families, latest methods to map forests, improved density maps, translation tools, and more.
Though the true value of Meta’s data likely lies in studying the impacts of social media itself, and tracking how online interaction influences political shifts, impacts user mental health, etc.
That’s a component where Meta’s worked hard to counter the pervading narratives, despite a growing range of studies indicating that social media exposure has had negative impacts on many users and communities over time.
It’ll be interesting to see whether Meta partners with researchers to expand their explorations into these elements, or whether it’ll look to limit access based on certain areas of focus, in an effort to keep such explorations in check.
Meta says that folks from qualified institutions “pursuing scientific or public interest research topics” will give you the chance to use for access to its updated Content and Library API through Meta research partners, starting with the University of Michigan’s Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
You may learn more about Meta’s Content Library and API tools here.