SAN vs NAS: A Complete Guide to Network Storage

SAN (storage area network) is a high-performance, high-speed network of storage, servers, and devices that enables access to consolidated, block-level storage. Multiple client devices can access it, and it often appears to the client OS as a disk. SAN storage separates the storage system from the remainder of the local area network (LAN). This fashion, they improve application performance, data protection, and disaster recovery if needed.

As already mentioned, storage area networks are often physically separated from the remainder of the LAN and may span multiple sites. They’re composed of SAN switches, hosts, and storage devices which are connected internally through a wide range of SAN technologies.

The five benefits of system area networks are:

1. Scalability: SAN storage might be scaled easily to suit evolving business needs. Must you need more storage, more capability might be added when and because it is required. That way, you won’t ever have more storage than you would like.
2. Backup: Data backup should all the time be a significant consideration, and if using SAN, you simply need a single backup server for data that’s potentially scattered across multiple locations.
3. Reduces LAN Bandwidth Issues: LAN-based storage systems might be subject to bandwidth bottlenecks as a consequence of the proven fact that a big chunk of the network traffic is brought on by data transfers. Since SAN takes that a part of traffic onto itself, the performance of the whole LAN would improve and reduce the time needed for other tasks.
4. Data Security: Using a SAN, data protection algorithms are consistent. At any time when you would like it, you could have access to accurate copies of any data on it. Moreover, should the LAN develop into compromised, your data could be secure because it is stored on a separate network.
5. Disaster Recovery: Centralized data might be easily copied to a separate recovery device that’s ideally stored at a separate location as well. As such, if and when needed, the info will also be easily recovered, should anything disastrous occur.

Listed here are three common disadvantages of using SAN:

1. Complexity: A SAN can add additional layers of complexity to existing systems, increasing workload management.
2. Cost: Implementing and managing a SAN might be cost-prohibitive for first-time users.
3. Management: A SAN could also be difficult to administer and will require a dedicated specialist to manage it.

Listed here are three of probably the most common SAN protocols used:

1. Fibre Channel Protocol (FCP): That is probably the most widely used SAN or block protocol. It’s deployed in the vast majority of the SAN market. FCP uses Fibre Channel transport protocols embedded with SCSI commands.
2. Web Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI): iSCSI incorporates SCSI commands inside an Ethernet frame. For data transport, it uses an IP Ethernet network.
3. Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE): It is analogous to iSCSI because it incorporates an FC frame inside an Ethernet datagram. It also uses an IP Ethernet network for transport.

SAN provides a high-speed infrastructure connecting servers to their logical disk units. A logical disk unit is an array of blocks allocated from a pool of storage units which are presented to the server as a logical disk.

Subsequently, when connecting to a SAN from a LAN or a server, the SAN actually appears like an area disk. It does that in a way that any client device can store data on the logical unit, as it might on any local style of storage device.

A well-designed and distributed SAN can withstand multiple device or component failures, keeping the info secure.

SAN has its own local file system that permits the servers to partition and format the blocks to make use of because the local storage units they seem as. Storage area networks are used as support for performance-sensitive applications corresponding to:

1. Oracle Databases: These are sometimes business-critical, and require the best performance and availability.
2. Microsoft SQL Server Databases: MS SQL Server databases also often store an enterprise’s most precious data. Subsequently, in addition they require the best performance and availability.
3. Virtualization Deployments using KVM, Microsoft Hyper-V, or VMware: These environments can extend to 1000’s of virtual machines running a big selection of operating systems and applications, sometimes with various performance requirements. These environments support many applications, so infrastructure reliability becomes much more essential because a failure could cause multiple application outages.
4. Large Virtual Desktop Infrastructures (VDIs): These environments serve virtual desktops to sometimes large numbers of a company’s users. A few of them number tens of 1000’s of virtual desktops. By centralizing them, organizations can more easily manage data security.
5. SAP, Large ERP, or CRM Environments: SAN architectures is usually a perfect fit for various resource planning and other resource management workloads.

Regarding the hardware, HDDs are being replaced or combined with SSDs, thus creating hybrid arrays, in addition to all-flash SANs.

So then, what are the important thing differences between San vs NAS (network-attached storage)?

Network-attached storage (NAS) is a network-based storage solution. NAS storage is a technique of managing storage centrally and sharing that storage with multiple servers. 

Unlike SAN, which uses Ethernet and FC, NAS uses Ethernet. Moreover, NAS focuses on ease of use, lower cost of ownership, and manageability. 

One other difference between the 2 is that NAS storage controllers partition the storage. This makes a NAS server seem like another file server to the client-server connected to it. While SAN stores data on the block level, NAS accesses it as files. Subsequently, it’s often related to unstructured data, corresponding to images or video content, while SAN often handles structured workloads like databases. 

Hybrid and all-flash NAS hardware can also be available as a consequence of the impact flash storage has had on storage mediums.

Listed here are five benefits of using NAS:

1. Architecture: NAS data lives in volumes of files and folders as an alternative of blocks in a typical client-server architecture.
2. Security: NAS provides security via user access controls and redundant data structures. 
3. Efficiency: NAS allows for a simple, quick, and low-cost method for data storage.
4. Inexpensive: NAS is cheaper to buy and maintain, although the price of a high-end NAS will cost greater than an entry-level SAN. 
5. Stability: Utilizing NAS removes individual servers as single points of failure.

There are just a few disadvantages to contemplate when selecting NAS:

1. Single Point of Failure: Because NAS is taken into account an area on-site backup drive, failures can occur, resulting in data loss. 
2. Speed: Heavy use of a NAS system could cause significant network congestion and lower transfer speed. 
3. Scalability: NAS devices should not easily scalable as a consequence of the constraints of the hardware.
4. Quotas: System admins must implement user quotas to stop overutilization of shared space.
5. Management: Basic networking knowledge is required to implement a NAS.
6. Functionality: Capabilities will vary depending on manufacturer, chip, and size. Typically, NAS is barely used for storage. 

Listed here are the 2 mostly used NAS protocols:

1. Common Web File Services/Server Message Block (CIFS/SMB): That is the protocol that Windows often uses.
2. Network File System (NFS): NFS was first developed to be used with UNIX servers and can also be a standard Linux protocol.

Utilize the chart below to simply compare SAN vs NAS:

Typically, SMBs could be higher served to utilize a NAS device, whereas larger entities with the resources to take a position within the architecture and management would cash in on employing a SAN. 

Here’s a checklist of things for consideration when reviewing the necessity for storage options:

• Architecture needs.
• Data processing models.
• Network protocols and capabilities.
• Performance constraints.
• Scalability requirements.
• Management assets.
• Backup challenges.
• Redundancy imperatives.
• Disaster recovery dictates.
• Storage virtualization options.
• Price (TCO).

Evaluating these parameters prior to investing in a storage system will provide a clearer picture when defining the needs of a company. 

Whether you are storing databases or other varieties of data, a versatile cupboard space like SAN storage is all the time a great idea. Network storage is cost-effective, distant, and secured, making it an ideal alternative for our increasingly distant workforce of today.

Check Out Liquid Web SAN Storage Today For High-Performance Block-Level Storage For Your Growing Infrastructure